10.2.1 Foundations

Let $A$ be a set.

A reflexive relation is equivalently:1

  • An $\mathbb {E}_{0}$-monoid in $(\mathrm{N}_{\bullet }(\mathbf{Rel}(A,A)),\chi _{A})$.

  • A pointed object in $(\mathbf{Rel}(A,A),\chi _{A})$.


  1. 1Note that since $\mathbf{Rel}(A,A)$ is posetal, reflexivity is a property of a relation, rather than extra structure.

In detail, a relation $R$ on $A$ is reflexive if we have an inclusion

\[ \eta _{R}\colon \chi _{A}\subset R \]

of relations in $\mathbf{Rel}(A,A)$, i.e. if, for each $a\in A$, we have $a\sim _{R}a$.

Let $A$ be a set.

  1. 1.

    The set of reflexive relations on $A$ is the subset $\smash {\mathrm{Rel}^{\mathrm{refl}}(A,A)}$ of $\mathrm{Rel}(A,A)$ spanned by the reflexive relations.

  2. 2.

    The poset of relations on $A$ is is the subposet $\smash {\mathbf{Rel}^{\mathsf{refl}}(A,A)}$ of $\mathbf{Rel}(A,A)$ spanned by the reflexive relations.

Let $R$ and $S$ be relations on $A$.

  1. 1.

    Interaction With Inverses. If $R$ is reflexive, then so is $R^{\dagger }$.

  2. 2.

    Interaction With Composition. If $R$ and $S$ are reflexive, then so is $S\mathbin {\diamond }R$.

Item 1: Interaction With Inverses
Since $R$ is reflexive, we have $a\sim _{R}a$ for each $a\in A$. Since $a\sim _{R^{\dagger }}b$ iff $b\sim _{R}a$, it follows that $a\sim _{R^{\dagger }}a$ as well for each $a\in A$. Thus $R^{\dagger }$ is reflexive.

Item 2: Interaction With Composition
Since $R$ and $S$ are reflexive, we have $a\sim _{R}a$ and $a\sim _{S}a$ for each $a\in A$.

To prove that $a\sim _{S\mathbin {\diamond }R}a$ holds as well, we have to exhibit some $b\in A$ such that $a\sim _{R}b$ and $b\sim _{S}a$, following Chapter 8: Relations, Item 1 of Definition 8.1.3.1.1. Choosing $b=a$, we see that this condition is indeed satisfied. Thus $S\mathbin {\diamond }R$ is reflexive.


Noticed something off, or have any comments? Feel free to reach out!


You can also use the contact form below: